Thursday, 28 February 2019
Congratulations To All GMB Supporters
Tuesday, 26 February 2019
Press Statement On Presidential And National Assembly Polls.
Sunday, 24 February 2019
PDP insists.
Tuesday, 19 February 2019
Rule of Man Vs Rule of Law.
Vox/E
President Muhammadu Buhari caused quite a stir on Monday when he said those who influence ballot box snatching at the 2019 elections do so at risk to their lives.
The President, speaking in Abuja at a meeting of the national caucus of the All Progressives Congress (APC), following the one-week postponement of the elections announced on Saturday, had said: "Anybody who decides to snatch ballot boxes or lead thugs to disturb, it may be that [this will be] the last unlawful action you will take…
"The whole 36 states in Nigeria, I went round. I think I have got enough support across the country to look after me. So I'm going to warn anybody who thinks he has enough influence in his locality to lead a body of thugs to snatch boxes or to disturb the voting system, he will do it at the expense of his own life."
Having also said he was "giving the military and the police [the power] to be ruthless", it appeared Buhari had no problem with security forces gunning down ballot box snatchers.
But what exactly does the law prescribe for this electoral offence?
Sections 129 (1) and (2) Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2010 list Election Day offences as follows:
129 (1) No person shall on the date on which an election is held do any of the following acts or things in a polling unit or within a distance of 300 metres of a polling unit-
(a) canvass for votes;
(b) solicit for the vote of any voter;
(c) persuade any voter not to vote for any particular candidate;
(d) persuade any voter not to vote at the election;
(e) shout slogans concerning the election;
(f) be in possession of any offensive weapon or wear any dress or have any facial or other decoration which in any event is calculated to intimidate voters;
(g) exhibit, wear or tender any notice, symbol, photograph or party card referring to the election;
(h) use any vehicle bearing the colour or symbol of a political party by any means whatsoever;
(i) loiter without lawful excuse after voting or after being refused to vote;
(j) snatch or destroy any election materials; and
(k) blare siren.
(2) No person shall within the vicinity of a polling unit or collation centre on the day of which an election is held-
(a) convene, hold or attend any public meeting during the hours of poll as may be prescribed by the Commission;
(b) unless appointed under this Act to make official announcements, operate any megaphone, amplifier or public address apparatus;
(c) wear or carry any badge, poster, banner, flag or symbol relating to a political party or to the election.
"A person who contravenes any of the provisions of this section commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine of N100,000 or imprisonment for a term of 6 months for every such offence," Section 129 Subsection 3 confirms.
The following subsection lists the penalty for ballot-box-related offences. It says: "Any person who snatches or destroys any election material commits an offence and is liable on conviction to 24 months imprisonment."
Therefore, any other punishment beyond two years, such as the one advised by Buhari, runs foul of the law.
Monday, 18 February 2019
Buhari, APC Out to Truncate Democracy - PDP
JIMOH IBRAHIM SPEAKS
Monday, 4 February 2019
BREAKING: CJN at CCT: proceedings suspended abruptly
BREAKING: CJN at CCT: proceedings suspended abruptly
Osa
Proceedings at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), in the case against the suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen has been brought to an abrupt end to allow temper to seamer in view of the hot exchanges between tribunal Chairman, Danladi Umar and laed counsel for the defence, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN).
Trouble started when the tribunal Charman insisted that proceedings must continue despite agreement, by lawyer to the prosecution, Aluyu Umar (SAN) and Awomolo, that the case be adjourned to a later date in view of some recent developments in the case.
Rather than rule on the joint position presented by lawyers to the parties, the tribunal Chairman insisted on proceeding to hearing pending applications.
While Awomolo stood up to appeal to tibunal Chairman to consider the position presented by lawyers to the prosecution and defence, for an adjournment, Umar ordered Awomolo to sit down.
He accused the defence lawyer of encouraging delay and waste of time, observation Awomolo objected to and told the tribunal Chairman that it was wrong today such things about him.
While Awomolo spoke,complaining about the way the tribunal Chairman described him, Umar said he was not bothered, but was only interested in continuing with the case.
At that point, the prosecution lawyer sought for a short stand down, which was granted.